Spectacular video of a cruise missile slamming into the Pentagon on 911..

Have you heard about those government cover ups? What about x, y, z? Yep, it's all in here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWj-dUOWNzI
Video: Reporter describes 'cruise missile' hitting the Pentagon.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Vnu_yiUzls

The missile impact is in the last frames of the above 26 second video.


Image

Looks like the cruiser had a device that homed in on the laser spot!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcWT2lQszEE

Only minutes after the strike, a television reporter says there is nothing to indicate a plane struck the Pentagon.

Image Image

The highlighted object in the small pic, which is the first frame in the only officially released footage of the Pentagon strike, resembles the nosecone on the cruiser and the streaking object in the moving video above!

Image

Above is a shot of an aerial launch of a Russian CH 55 cruise missile, from a TU 160 aircraft.

Image
Pentacon.com

Now we must consider whether the plane climbing above the Pentagon, similarly launched the missile that hit that building.

Image

It seems it did, a cruise missile on the test range.. looks exactly like the Pentagon strike.

Image

Above N644AA2 Flght 77, the aircraft "they" say struck the building.

Image
Pentacon.com

This is the latest mystery plane, it is thought to be the same aircraft seen climbing over the Pentagon during its approach!

Image

Above, from Pentacon.com, a computer animation of the flyover compiled from the testimony of numerous eye witnesses.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=daNr_TrBw6E

Major General Albert "Bert" N. Stubblebine III, former head of all intelligence says: "I do know that the Pentagon was not hit by an aircraft, no way, the press is saying what they have been told to say, the stories about 9/11 are false."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUmr9dFbf2c

911 Commission member says missile strike, then quickly corrects himself.

Image

The previous mystery plane pictured over the White House at 9:44 am on 11 September 2001, was a highly modified E-4B Boeing 747 operated by the National Airborne Operations Center.
Martin Timothy
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 12:31 pm

«  » by drakke1
Flawless -- thanks a lot. There are many people at various levels of the psychopathic pyramid of control who require experiencing justice being visited upon them. Hopefully we'll live long enough to enjoy witnessing such. BTW, i'm amazed that this footage remains available. I'm going to check the link now -- hopefully there'll be yet more videos of a similar interesting nature on the page.
User avatar
drakke1
 
Posts: 11986
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 7:41 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

«  » by Smile
I never saw that video before, very interesting. I am still on the fence about the pentagon attack because of certain witness saying they did see the plane, but at the same time, the pentagon only released like 2 security cam tapes (neither of which show the plane) when there were dozens of cameras, so they are hiding something. At the very least there was a cover up of which plane hit the building if it wasn't in fact a missile.
User avatar
Smile
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 3:56 am

«  » by Martin Timothy
Smile wrote:..security cam tapes.


[video=youtube;Ld7fn2qykv4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ld7fn2qykv4&feature=player_embedded[/video]

In this tape the explosion is visible, however there is no sign of a plane!
Martin Timothy
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 12:31 pm

«  » by Martin Timothy
Evidence Refuted

Image
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/5308/pentagonplanehd3xx.jpg

Image
http://209.85.62.24/190/51/0/p141514/PentPlaneProperties.png

Image
http://209.85.62.24/190/51/0/p141038/PentPlane.png

http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=16889&hl=

JOK Says: I'd feel a whole lot better about it if that exif data read finepix instead of Photoshop CS2, or we had the original image directly from the camera.


http://www.scottpcook.com/clothmonkey/91101.htm

Rising up from the right center of the Pentagon’s mass was a gigantic spherical orange mass, the flames oddly bright and vivid in the clear direct sunlight. I stepped to the window, and instinctively put my hand to the glass .. a few seconds after the explosion, the glass rattled and a dull boom shook the room.

As we watched the black plume gather strength, less than a minute after the explosion .. directly in back of the plume, which would place it almost due west from our office, a four engine propeller plane .. coming from an odd direction and .. descending at a much steeper angle than most aircraft.

Trailing a thin, diffuse black trail from its engines, the plane reached the Pentagon at a low altitude and made a sharp left turn, passing just north of the plume .. it made another sharp left turn to the north and climbed rapidly .. leaving only the thin black trail. Scott P Cook

Image
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/gifs/c-130approachgif1.gif
Martin Timothy
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 12:31 pm

«  » by Yann
1. That is not a "spectacular video" by any stretch of the imagination.

2. I downloaded the picture you claim was created by a Pier Murru and checked the properties myself. They were blank. (And let me point out that there's nothing to stop someone from entering that description themselves.) However, the Advanced Properties show that the picture was indeed taken on a Fujifilm camera on September 11th, 9:37 AM - the exact minute the Pentagon was hit. The year says 2002, which could be caused by having accidentally set the year incorrectly. If this was a fake, I think they would have gotten the year right.
User avatar
Yann
 
Posts: 1045
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 4:12 am

«  » by tappsislandmom
The year says 2002, which could be caused by having accidentally set the year incorrectly. If this was a fake, I think they would have gotten the year right.
________

Maybe not?
tappsislandmom
 
Posts: 769
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:34 am

«  » by drakke1
Here's a thread that appeared today on GLP on topic. Very credible http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1197422/pg1 Perhaps it's finally time that the real perpetrators swing?
User avatar
drakke1
 
Posts: 11986
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 7:41 pm
Been thanked: 2 times

«  » by Magnus
I wouldn't waste my time trying to figure it out. There were planes that hit the buildings. Perhaps there were both. To say that there were no passenger planes is like claiming that men never landed on the moon. If you believe there were no passenger planes, just move on and don't go talking about it because it will discredit everything else you say about 9-11 being an inside job. If these zionists are as evil as I think they are, they wouldn't go so far as to pretend that planes hit because they cared too much about real people being killed. What is making people believe this sort of conspiracy? It is totally illogical. It sounds like controlled opposition propaganda.
Magnus
 
Posts: 2772
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:50 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 3 times

«  » by tappsislandmom
Okay...I asked my husband to look at this thread. He works on jets for his career. He made the wings in his 20's but not anymore and he goes to when planes crash or damaged ect and travels around the world for this type of work. He's home right now and not traveling at this moment. He works "aircraft on ground". He's been on Dick Chenney's plane before.
He said, from the video, it doesn't look like a plane at all but a missle, then he said, drop it, and didn't want to talk about it anymore. He only looked at the pentagon one. He doesn't really talk about work.
Janet
tappsislandmom
 
Posts: 769
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:34 am

«  » by tappsislandmom
On the twin towers you can see the airplanes.
Janet
tappsislandmom
 
Posts: 769
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:34 am

«  » by Martin Timothy
The Official Story as per Popular Mechanics

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/debunking-911-myths-pentagon#bigplane

ASCE team member Mete Sozen, a professor of structural engineering at Purdue University: In this case, one wing hit the ground the other was sheared off by the force of the impact with the Pentagon's load bearing columns .. what was left of the plane flowed into the structure in a state closer to a liquid than a solid mass.
Martin Timothy
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 12:31 pm

«  » by Michael Unbreakable
I try not to think about this one so much. I feel as though there's too much controversy going on. I do think, however, that it was an inside job due to how easily the towers fell. It looked as if the towers were exploding from the ground up, as well, which indicates bombs? Also, that whole W. Bush thing where he messed up some things about the times? Or was it something else. (apathetic to my forgetting what I'm talking about)
User avatar
Michael Unbreakable
 
Posts: 2460
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 11:41 pm

«  » by Martin Timothy
Image

The most disturbing factor, is in the shot that shows the inverted A symbol with the extended crossbar in yellow, to the left of the exit hole on the inside of C Ring, that appears to have Hebrew script below the letters MD.


Image Image Image

The same symbol has appeared the right way up at other places, not least at a 1984 Texas massacre scene, and in the "Anarchy" theme being touted by the right wing media .. The symbol is an abbreviated form of the Satanic inverted pentagram rune, traditionally associated with Devil worship.
Martin Timothy
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 12:31 pm

«  » by AmentiHall
I don't understand how anyone can be on the fence about this (no offence). I Knew the moment it happened and I was like 14 years old. Nothing in my opinion has changed since then.....

There was no wreckage.

The section of the pentagon that exploded was highly suspect.

Plus there is the war games that were being played at the exact same time that it happened.

Among preparing/scrambling for this kind of event exactly at the time that it happened!

The pictures/footage do not add up with official description in the most basic kind of way. But they truly believe (and they are right) the average person is too gullible and stupid to figure that out....and so they got away with it, like they do with everything else they do in plain sight. Sigh oh well.
User avatar
AmentiHall
 
Posts: 11276
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 2:12 am
Has thanked: 166 times
Been thanked: 1066 times


  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to index page Conspiracy Corner

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests