Lola you are professionally ignorant. You are illustrating that in your many years of nursing..you have seen bad practice!
http://www.medicinenet.com/circumcis...dure/page2.htm.
Though you, I, and luna are not giving professional advice, you are communicating professional ignorance and your logic is falliable. I posted a link illustrating the standard of practice to reduce "pain" that is not remembered nor sustained past 24 hours supported by research and biometric reading that has evidence to support it and not lolas truism.
Additional as male who is circumsized can give personal testimony to counter you "personal" assumptions about an experience that you will never have as a female. Your speculation is full of unsophistcate assertions and notions not supported in the medical community.
An episiotomy is not analogous to a circumcision. Additionally your use of it in this discussion illustrates a true lkack of education accumen of it.
Episiotomy vs Circumcision
Traditionally; episiotomys were done circumcisions are not.
Permission; they wont ask of if it means they have to get consent from parent
protecting the labor/child; the parent is agreeing avoid unnecessary "natural"
vaginal mutilation
Pain; They are suppose to numb at times... They numb with topical
The pain resolves in 24 hours but kegal The pain stimuli is gone
for a life time essentially after one feeding
http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/episiotomy/HO00064
I have included a link that is layman about this topic.
You spoke about cleaniness in an above post that contradicted your notion in the previous when you stated that your son and your husband had a mom that taught then how to clean! Luna correct that illogic and now your retort is that they can do it when they are an adult. As a female you are making decisions or suggesting that the timeliness of these decisions are approiate when an indivdual has the cognitive faculties to make an informed decision adulthood. That logic is far from an educated inference. Maturity, scholarship, exposure, experience, knowledge, and understand are just a few measures to facilitate "good and sound" decisions.
"The miles not the distance" http://www.aafp.org/afp/990315ap/1514.html
The risk are the same regardless of age and the procedure does not change!
Here is a layman website from "men" that contradict all your points!
http://www.circinfo.net/.
You are giving a personal account and you dont have the profession understanding or credentials for it to even be considered as a well informed argument. Luna graciously afforded your ignorance and opinion with the comment to each there own!
I will do the same but so that the community can see just how one sided you passionate mind works.
The same "parent right" that you or any body has to say "no"; is ultimately the same parental right for another to say "yes". Parents are saying yes... if it be for spiritual, ignorance/misunderstanding, or tradition.
To suggest that parental guardianship should not over rule a babys right to make a decision is silly, uneducated, and with out any comprehensive understanding of maturity, adulthood etc. The entire American society and the world disagree with you and calling it a indigo resolve is pawning ignorance and immaturity off on a plateform of eclectic thought and existential reasoning!
The data that you have provided to support any ascertion that circumcisions should not be done because;
1 you are not respecting the babies right
2 its very painful and could lead to adverse consequences
3 its mutilation and tradition is not an excuse
Are all premise that are not sound, not logical, and dont support your concluding "opinion(s)".
You have to be willing not weight both sides of the argument against "evidence base", "comprehensive understanding", and reasoning above partiality.
You are aged and have calender experience...I wont argue that! However as you articulate that we measure the wisdom or usefulness of that calender experience. You have displayed a continued static position in life and understanding. So I am not surprised of the lack in understanding as it relates to this topic from an academic and medical point of view.
You have communicated your bias, your partiality, and an opinion. Thank you for that, but wisdom from your personal experience is questionable.
I am glad you are not in a position that requires a provider to give accurate informational empowerment as it relates to responsible, ethical, unbiased, and comprehensive intellectual command of this procedure the benefits and adversities as it is supported by evidence base medicine in the field of medical practice.
You would be sued and even the nursing board would sanction you as you obviously are out of your scope of practice and understanding.
Bookmarks