So let's put it like this X has proven to be true.
Somebody states X is true.
Therefore he is bias because X is false.
This is your warped logic. If anything, everything you're stating is a complete and perfect example of bias thought pattern.
Here is a great example of bias thought pattern:
Regardless of all the evidence that X is true, I will continue to consider X to be false.
Sound familiar? I'm sure it sounds very familiar because that's you. Hence, your idea of "I'm just stating a fact.", there is nothing factual in anything you're stating whatsoever. Those who are bias disregard all evidence. Those who are bias make rancid posts as in the examples of your abusive flames in order to impose a false idea. Obviously since you can't use logic to support an idea, you might as well retort with abuse right?
I'll even repost my statement that you falsely claim to be "bias":
"Yes. Especially towards Indigos. The cyberbullying in this place is seriously out of hand. Instead of doing something about it, mods partake in all of it. Especially when it comes to abuse towards Indigos."
This is a non-bias observations based on hard factual evidence. So the only way my statement would be "bias" is if I had no ability to prove any of what I am saying. Not that it matters considering "proof" is something real bias types have no concept of when they come to their bias conclusions, and try to bully others who speak out against their bias fallacy. Which is exactly how you responded to that post. I doubt, anybody who isn't bias would respond according to the bias and methods of communication you promote.