Hello.

I have been working on this as I am in the moment with time on my hands these seasonal days.

Which is nice.

Making more and more research

i arrive at a place on my journey

worthy of note here

before moving on.

The question of existence has bothered me in various positions and angles of view for some long time.

Now it seems I may have a theory to report that can make some sense.

I posted before how electron pairing is not illusory but complaint with a timeless point of origin

that provides a universal map for any travel plans

embedded in our atomic formula at its basic construction.

In the beginning ( before this beginning), all was one, and one was all.

Whilst I respect the situation I am not happy about the reasoning to make the decision.

We were not consulted.

We had no say in the purpose

and are left trying to learn how to swim in a liquid we cannot yet correctly name.

It gives us the same respect as you would a dog, who, understanding by instinct that rain is wet

and water makes ponds.

The dog cannot give a lake a name

or understand why it exists or even what water means

except, its nice to drink a drop of the good stuff.

So we revert to H and the 5W's.

Hswis.

Our good friends to assist our enquiries.

Having arrived at a theory that defines instant communication

that perversely, if we are sure here,

crosses the boundary of the universe, pops outside, and then back in to meet its partner paired electron

at any given location, this develops a few thoughts.

Firstly, space/time becomes irrelevant to any two points in the universe, as long as the origin is inside the viewer.

This explains to some degree the perversion of measurement of subatomic ephemera being only there when we look.

If present in person or not, being by equipment alone, the view prevails to substantiate the action over procedure as being a simple cause and effect.

Secondly, this opens the way forwards to travel without moving to any point of paired partner electrons anywhere in the universe that we hold in our base map single electron of the pair, which I suspect to be mainly or even wholly in our brains.

How then, could this process be coordinated?

By taking four positions of localized electrons, we cross refer a 3D grid point in space/time, which is always and exactly "now".

How then, can this measurement of mapping be accomplished?

To understand the universe, it is necessary to experiment with astral travel and know where your paired partners are.

And/or:-

To visit places foreseen, and maybe mapped out in a procedure that follows the physical visible universal galactic map. Place by place, in numbers, to share information and map the universe part by part, going outwards to follow the spiral of slow energy.

And/or:-

To make your way in a randomized fashion as one would glossing through a magazine without bothering with the content index, and come across items of interest by the nearest progress based on chance.

In my view, chance exists only in mathematics, and is based on laws of probability; so i don’t see what element of chance remains, except an action based on an outcome of probability over attention. Our attention is reasoned by personal choice, and thus, we have the same effect as measuring the charge of an electron pair. When we do it, there will be a result that is either good or bad, and the construct by repetition will form a pattern that will tell a tale upon which one could draw further reasoned theoretical conclusions.

Allow me please to now move on the the construct of mathematics I spoke of before.

Zero, is nothing, and a base node.

One, is the golden ratio, or 1.618 etc., and the 2nd node.

Two is Pi, and the 3rd node.

So we have 3 nodes to play with, backed by a torture of explanation necessary to support each one and even more so, all in a pattern.

3 numbers that form the true maths of the universe that are relevant and not fabricated like the maths of previous civilizations and this one.

Whilst we can lay these numbers in an equatorial ( equalateral) triangle of nodes for a pretty picture, they are flat and not curious. They are not 3D.

Why should they be 3D?

What would 3D make extra to this nodal pattern that would mean anything or even be a relevant; let alone be a correct question to ask?

The reason to ask this question is along the path and inconclusive to make the leap from a singularity outside space/time, to become a slow energy constructed with matter in space/time. To ask, and answer, why did the universe come into being?

When you build a tent in a field, there is a floor, and at least 3 sides, ending at a point in the roof. You require the field first as the floor. Then you lay out your three corners (node) flat. Then you join the three edges from each field node to the single roof node.

The single roof node is interesting, as I don’t have a name for this as I write. It could easily be space/time, or slow energy, or both. I could simply call this node, the universal node; or "being". I will attend to this. In fact, thinking about it, the 4th node must at the very least, be something. so I will refer to it as 'something.'

Having completed your tent in a field, you have a tetrahedron. A 3- sided pyramid with 4 planes and 4 nodes. The most simple construct in 3D, apart from a sphere, which is actually the most complex. ( see my avatar for some idea). This has value in space/time, as it works to make a past. present and future. The relative values of space and time can be moved around to suit the moment, but the interplay of nodes cannot. There must always be at least, 4 nodes and some space between each of them to enforce the planes sizes; and thus, time.

Without space between the nodes, no matter how empirical or small, there can be no time, and therefore, the universe fails to exist.

This is a quantum shell, and the most basic construct, from which and around which atoms and sub atomic ephemera are formed.

Let us call the quantum universe the mirror of the atomic universe, where its construction is riven with speculation and misunderstanding. Maybe the term 'mirror' is not accurate enough; but it will do for this moment.

Let us consider that the values of atoms, are in fact the surface of a field that is analogous to the surface of water in a pond; in the air, we are taught that life follows intuitive principles and laws. Under the water, life is quite different. This can only be because the quantum field of sub atomics, works in different ways; and therefore, the can be no unified overall single theory of the universe, unless differences are inclusive. It is necessary to accept that fields have edges and surfaces, and there are sides; which if you see things that way, make perfect sense, with no straight lines, of theory, but purely logical interpretation without bending facts to suit scientific conclusions that don’t exist.

Its no good thinking that a field is flat and 2D either. This field is everywhere all the time, and made up of such small interactions, that its surface is best described, I think, as a universal singularity that came into being the moment when the first tent poles were put up on the first tent in the first field, and will end with the final pole being removed.

I refer to the word pole in its twin states as well.

To conclude, the path has taken me to where I can say that, I agree with the thinking that the 4th node is the universal space/time, the number without a number; or let us say, infinity plus zero plus one plus two, according to my numbering reference.

4 = 2+1+ 0

Don’t try and differ with current maths, It does not apply.

But

You can change it how you like. its not a law. it functions as this code.

The objective is to define the construct with its most basic building block.

In a pattern that is able to tessellate and grow by either crystal, magnetic or gravitas according to some current thinking well known.

Now, we need to have faith and take a leap forwards. lets try and mix one and two, instead of adding them. lets square them.

when we do this, a rather magical formula results. instead of a 2D triangle, that is built up in our field as a our little tetrahedral tent standing up, it has 4 dimensions in 3D.

It becomes something in time. a construct inside a dimension. the process of change from addition to mixing makes the value of time

be fabricated in, by, with, around and upon the crystalline construct.

our dimension where we are now.

some refer to the process of constructing the tent in the field as original cosmic expansion.

i like to think that nothing existed before something.

Look at this idea from this angle;

nothing is zero, expressed in maths.

it can be a number alone in maths,

but what of our reality?

where did nothing begin before there was time?

nothing has a status to which we give it existence.

if it has existence now, which i trust all would agree upon,

at what point could we consider this existence to have begun

if it is the same nothing then and now?

is it the same?

The same something seems to have been a constant from the beginning

as far back as we can see and feel.

allow me to make this assumption for nothing as well to continue;

this nothing was here before something.

in order for that to have been so, the universe

had to be nothing

at least an instant before something

if not much longer, out of time.

like a recipe, take a jar of nothing, add some PHY mixed with PI

and make something.

ah. this is funny.

so we could say that nothing is zero= 0

and the golden ratio is PHY = 1.618 etc

and Pi = 3.142 etc

and then we have the result that is

something which is a node of the basic tetrahedron ( 4 nodes in a 3D formation)

something = S

If we then add the base zero before there was something

before the construct of the tetrahedron

we have an analogy that appears to be

zero plus (zero plus the golden ratio times pi) equals something.

or

0+(0+PHYxPI)=S

which to my minds reads in English as

...OOPPS.

dots are the four nodes represented accordingly.

the process philosophically as expressed longhand by maths code is interesting too. we start with nothing. we add nothing to a golden ratio. we mix the golden ratio with a circle's ratio to its diameter. then, we eventually end up with nothing again. its finite. circular. it loops as a process. we should ask all the questions about the positioning of the one and two.

but, here we are now. in ...OOPPS.

which would be a great joke to play upon reality really in my view

akin to the understanding of our own mortality

which was the basic understanding

that meant the discovery of reason by philosophy

represented in the apple shared in the story of Adam and Eve

being that birth, life and death are mortal.

that leads me to the old joke about understanding that there has to be a God because death is his final joke on us and all we strive for while being here.

There is a simple parallel. there was life before us. life is with us. life continues after us.

we are made from the basic construct of crystalline tetrahedrons into this reality

this also implies that when we look forwards,

nothing will also exist after the universe dissipates

...OOPPS. O

so we had better hurry up and all evolve into spiritual energy

so we can move to and occupy another dimension

or we will end here.

try explaining this plan to some one with stinky feet...

the other ways to engage the same parts in different patterns lead to nothing logical. only nothing,

which enforces the above view somewhat, if you want to play with those parts in all the other ways possible.

and that, postulates an intelligently originated construct ( this ...OOPPS. here now).

The outcome is to see

on top of all this

that the spiritual is real and connected and here and has use and merit.

It comes from something we all know about.

A connection,

Which is the exact way our brains work in function.

Here, I have tried to explain how that connection exists instantly outside space/time.

Where ever, always now.

I try and show why it works.

How it works.

Many people look for the words and cannot find the right ones to say these explanations.

They feel part of it.

They have the instinct.

They know its around but cannot focus on it.

For some reason, the clarity eludes them.

I hope this lights the way forwards for others to follow this path further.

It is our destiny to travel without moving.

Be sure I will talk more on this another day

as my path progresses

Blessings.