In reference to some of my prior posts on this thread, i have been developing the relationship of the basic tetraheral construct.
Looking at the four fundemental forces in nature, it seems appropriate to consider their relationship to this primary crystal tetrahedron.
This leads me to consider the process of construction as a relationship; where could the 4 forces align to become part of this natural relationship, possibly developing the idea that the numbering system in nature is base 4?
And, if it is base 4 as I am considering, then this would make nature and its process of universal construction meaningful to remove the element of possibility in quantum fields and replace it with ordered interactions; at least, to the view that this is a choice gate, and as such, able to be used for the purpose of instantaneous travel to any universal destination through connection to the remote paired electron, by instantly flipping outside the universe and then back in. The Universal GPS network in NOW spacetime.
In this context, random locations of paired electrons, which in this day and age would apear to be odd to the point of nonsensical, would be entirely appropriate if they were seperated in an event way back in time such as the big bang, and wnet their sepearte ways.
The energy required to make this happen would be, in my estimation, limited to choice at this structured moment during the process of the birth.
Let us consider one type of strategy.
All energy is released at one event. Its natural state is much as we have today in the process of continuous expansion, or at least, slowing to movement from original force in direction.
The energy want to destroy itself in an equal event of existance and destruction.
But, there is not enough room for that to happen all in one instant. There is a cascade effect. The so-called expansion. The energy pushes outwards, forced by the need for that behind it to annaihilate itself before the onset of the 4 forces take over and predetermine the cooling construct.
What begins the expansion is the need to make room to destruct, and what ends it is the formation of spacetime, which is a good enough reason to suppose as to why it should happen over such a short moment.
You might say that from nothing (0) there came to be an expansion (1) into nothing (0) that ended with the imposition of a quantum box; and this box that was the stopping of the expansion, is the definition of itself in spacetime (2), creating the primary universal structure (3).
Let us remember that everything was in this box then. The created matter and antimatter and all the remaining energy, still without form yet. And s energy takes up no room at all, its not hard to keep an entire universe in your hot pocket.
What container of a hot pocket could handle such a high temperature and pressure?
An event of a meeting?
Two stable components coming together to form a simple limited reaction, in a mix?
A cosmic analogy for an ancient lab experiment?
To consider to answer these questions, I want to look at possibility now. What is chance, and how does possibility as opposed to random nature interact with the evidence?
Let us consider the vaue of possibility by its use as a definition.
We use the current model to concurr with any usual analysis today. What if posssibility is variable in its definition, as were the 4 forces constructed by the chronology of the chain of events in the process during the big bang? What is the chance of the big bang going the way it did, was, on a scale of zero to one, exactly one?
We can allude to this fact now, in hindsight oh yes.
But at the moment prior to and at the composition of the universe, how could chance, which is a structure based on the privilege of being subject to spacetime, have any possible connection to the event? Is the definition of possiblity then, the illusion here?
Chance is not a constant, yet some choose to impose its concept of constancy on a pre-universe. Chance depends on the use of all variables and facts to be specified.
The event of the universe coming into being was and still is, the same fact, not an interpritation of possibility. The possibility of this universe coming into being is another question. Some there are who get their questions mixed together.
So, here we are, and a fact.
The dice rolled and landed before the Big Bang started. Its natural composition was contrived already to be there; and not such an easy mix to add a little extra pepper to, or less salt. It was what it was.
Where spacetime is an obstacle as well as illusory, imposed by forces in place, the pre-universal composition would have had to be composed in other dimensions, without this imposition; and there are some who suspect that the big bang was the meeting of two dimensions at an event. The reason as to why this may have happened is not too clear from these people.
Due to the fact ( is this an assumption that is safe?) that the Big Bang did happen, I would prefer to make further investigation as to why. Its not the best idea to be sitting in the Arctic circle saying that it is hot today as the temperature has gone up seven degrees from yesterday but is still minus 20. Its a matter of perspective.
Shall we then, consider that the singularity was the key to open the door? The pin to pop the balloon? The knife to cut into nothing?
The inception of this universe, into which was then shoved the content of the expansion through the open door? Are we now, still expanding, still being shoved through this open door? Is the acceleration of cosmic expansion ( possibly theoretically limited to the speed of light) being pushed now from way back then? With the cause of gravity, is this expansion possibly a cosmic falling as pulling, or is it pushing rather than consequential? Or, is this consequence the value of the original door still being open?
Getting away from one strategy and back to the possible cause of the Big Bang, taking into consideration that consequence is the outcome of cause and effect;
Of all the possible explanations, would there in effect be more than one that could be accurate, or even feasable?
Is there more than one way to send a stone flying into a pond?
The real issue is one of how this is explained.
I proposed that the cosmic numbering system is made up of 4 digits only. 0, 1, 2 and 3, and gave my explanation.
This system corrolates well with the 4 forces of nature, although my explanation of them would differ.
And, that any other maths is out of whack.
Nature has a 'just enough' attitude readily proven too many times not to be accepted for any change to occur.
Change. Yes. All this matter and antimatter being formed and destroyed as soon as it had the spacetime in order to do it.
Let us consider the singularity, the key that opened the door to here.
Its one point.
There is not much that can be done if everything is squashed into one point. It needs to spread out and cool down, as proven. The question of the existance of nothing prior to somehting, i have discussed before. Nothing MUST exist at or before the point of something existing, in order for something to expand into it-- the same nothing that composes the invisible universe people cannot see today, far beyond the visible universe by now, that is part of this dimension. Spacetime beyond the distance of this visible universe.
The process of expansion has cause and effect. Consequences. During which, the rates and application are NOT constant, but variable in dimension up to 4D. In other words, an event happening on the surface of the expansion, would be different to one still coming on from its centre. They would not be consistently happeneing all at once, but in a staged event that you could say had some similarities to the process by which our sun shines, from deep with itself to the surface, and then out from there.
This difference is my base to understanding as to why all the matter and antimatter did not combust; or that there was more matter han antimatter as a consequence, which leads me to consider that its all still here- as dark energy and dark matter, in its residual destroyed form. ( It has to go somewhere).
Considering the differnt attributes of matter and antimatter, as in positive and negative, one could postulate that the positive matter was inside of the expansion when the negative antimatter was outside, during the process, for one view. This would mean that quantively, the gradual destruction was affected by the surface area of the expansion in a nuclear bang event, such as the sun is but a bit faster. Matter being held back or flug out? One or the other, to explain the fact we are here and antimatter had its moment. Which though...?
Geting back to chance not being constant, or being bitten in the ass by a snake as someone might say, in a dream, the whole point of the Young's light experiment is not the consequence of the outcome of measurement being the move into probability.
They ask the wrong question.
That experiment was made to ask one question only:
In the event that we measure energy, it stops moving and becomes a particle with mass.
This is the key to travelling without moving, from one electron of a pair to another remote electron of the same pair.
You can stop looking for any other answer now, thanks.
thats all you need to understand the universe's spooky action at a distance.
What has that got to do with chance and probability?
Nothing at all.
Not by gloves in a box.
By turning energy into a particle.
It doesnt matter if its positive or negative paired before, during or after.
The consequence is that energy is kind enough to let you know where it is when you look at it, by becoming a particle that has position in spacetime. And it even tells you what charge it has, and its partner.
In the entire cosmos, only one paired electron will make its charge known at the instant your measured one does.
Its a cosmic GPS locator.
Its an invitation.
To use this as the key to travel instantly through spacetime.
Why people dont see this simple invitation, is beyond me.
In any human brain, there are enough electrons to map the entire universe worth travelling to.
Any Earth-like planet you like.
Is this fair enough???
I could yat on but its lunchtime and I have other stuff to do.