Wahhabism & New World Order

#1
https://bouddhanar.blogspot.fr/2015/09/w ... ondia.html

T Wahhabism ideology of cutthroats Daech, is a genuine epistemological break with the classical Islamic tradition, but also over what to name the popular Islam. [...] This is indeed a schismatic heresy that Muslim scholars, but also the secular Arab intellectuals refer to as "Dajjal", whose most accurate translation would be the antichrist! [...] 


[center]Young trapped[/center]

In the European Union the majority of young people from immigrant backgrounds have a knowledge of their religion extremely summary. Therefore it is easy to influence by preaching an original so-called Islam, pure and infalsifié ... like the laws of liberal competition must strive by all means, including coercive, to become "pure and perfect "in the earthly paradise of hypercapitalism. 


[center]Jacques Attali, Bernard-Henri Lévy and many other agitators[/center]

If Islam was limited to the different expressions of Wahhabism, the total war between civilizations would be close. We are talking about a war between one billion Western Christian culture to a billion and a half Muslims. Madness and absurdity of such a perspective is obvious. Yet this clash of cultures, some - like these thinkers that are lined agitators in France Jacques Attali, the Bernard-Henri Lévy and many others, especially in the neoconservative Washington think tanks - have the probable if not as inevitable. And we know that the influence of these master thinkers can go, as in the case of Libya, to the bloodshed and Sustainable chaos. 


[center]Primary and misinterpretations of the Koran[/center]

Wahhabism is exacerbated literalism. From this perspective alone it is exorbitant of the Islamic faith as revealed in the Qur'an. To illustrate this recall that the preaching of the jurist Abdul Wahhab (1703-1792) develops by taking every word, every sentence Recitation strictly literally.That is to say, in its absolute literal sense so that he arrives to tell the Quran phenomenal enormities. So God is actually sitting on a throne and would have a hell leg. Every Muslim is clear that Allah endow a material body has something particularly incongruous ... no one knowing that this type of representation is purely metaphorical. This is an image rather than an anthropomorphic description of God. 


[center]Negations and manipulations for political purposes[/center]


But that would be nothing if it literalism, this primary reading of the Qur'an led early followers of Wahhabism, on the pretext of a return to sources, ie a salafiyyah, an imitation of the Prophet's life, to the negation of the very principles of Islam ... or to reduce the Qur'an to a restrictive legal play to the extreme handled according to the needs of political conquest and consolidation of a temporal power ... that of the ruling family of Saudi or multiple avatars of the Muslim Brotherhood and Turkey with the Erdogan regime islamokémaliste I! 
[center]Jihad dévoyé[/center]

Worse, the Wahhabis have come to invent a sixth pillar of the Islamic faith. Namely a hidden obligation would be that of conversion by force or ill of unbelievers and apostates ... believers regard in this case all Shia and Sufi currents, and most Sunni Muslims whose practices are vitiated by religious disbelief. To do this the Wahhabis have invented from scratch a duty of holy war. A misguided interpretation of jihad which is above all - not in deference to malicious of all persuasions - perfection of an individual effort. Initially an internal war itself, war against our weaknesses, passions and the temptation of evil, which we live where we constantly lurks. In doing Wahhabis, imposing the obligation of Jihad, committed what doctors refer to as bid'a a reprehensible innovation. [...] 


[center]Wahhabism and the Muslim Brotherhood[/center]

Without being a "Wahhabi secret society", the Muslim Brotherhood are not least one of the extensions of the mother sect headquartered in Riyadh. A meticulous comparison between the doctrines and programs deserve to be led. But insist on a point raised previously: Wahhabism as the Jamiat al-Ikhwan al muslimin [the Muslim Brotherhood] are essentially primarily ideological tools that is to say not in their religious trappings of Puritanism . These are idéocratiques means of conquest and nothing else. On the evident Wahhabism is not the simple and pure expression of a living faith, but his outrageous caricature. Muslims are not mistaken who denounce it as such. These are the Islamic scholars who say it at every turn. [...] That is to say, those whose "West" lazy can not hear the voice because it is easier to make the bazaar sociology in the suburbs of European cities with a high density immigration ... that to look with some humility on the theological dimension of the jihadi phenomenon and its proactive support by the other puritanical Calvinism what Anglo-American when it is an instrument of imperialism soulless bowels. 

[center]The Islamic State of supports: Washington, London, Paris, Riyadh, Tel Aviv, Amman, Doha, Ankara.[/center]

Today forgotten, the Association of Muslim Brotherhood created by Hassan al-Banna in 1928 soon after birth welcomes members of the Ikhwan fleeing the Nejd to escape reprisals Abdelaziz ibn Saud. These are the men who will form the core of the new Egyptian Brotherhood. When in 1954 the Brotherhood is dissolved by Nasser, conversely, the Brotherhood of executives leave naturally rejuvenate in Riyadh. Ultimately, the Brotherhood born in seventy years the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, Daech predecessor of which was the restoration of the caliphate in Egypt.This is what has just accomplished the Islamic state with the blessing of "enemy brothers allies" Ankara, London, Paris, Riyadh, Doha, Washington, Amman and Tel Aviv. 

[center]Take control of Islam and impose the new world religion 
(adapted to Islam)[/center]

The continued expansion of Wahhabism in the past century is closely linked to the financial model, economic and societal Anglo-US. The fate of the Arabian Peninsula has been inextricably linked since 1945 and until today the American World ... which forms a kind of hydra with multiple heads, the main ones Manhattan, Chicago (global commodities exchange ), Washington with the Federal Reserve, the City of London, Brussels for NATO, Frankfurt, headquarters of the European Central Bank and Basel that houses a super limited company in the legal sense, the Bank of central banks, in a word, Bank for International Settlements! As such it would be simplistic to see in the Wahhabi ideology as an instrument of influence or regional domination. The Muslim world is a billion and a half people. Take their control is an important issue. In this perspective probably we should see in the Wahhabi ideology attempted unequivocally subversion of Islam. In other words, the Islamic version, namely "adapted to Islam," the new global religion which tends to impose on all nations and all people, whether Christian or Muslim. Social Religion, civilizational mutation religion that precedes and accompanies the progress of a cannibal globalism. A religion designed to replace all others and that can appropriately describe as the "monotheism of the market". 

Excerpt from the interview with Jean-Michel Vernochet, author of "Strayed". 

Download free the entire interview: 
https://www.luttedeclasse.org/dossier28/ ... 241214.pdf 

[center]Strayed: Is Wahhabism a against Islam?[/center]

In the near and far East, war, violent and deaf at once, takes place under the eyes of a West struck blind. A new ideology, though aged two and a half centuries, rises and now tends to emerge as the new Muslim orthodoxy, Wahhabism. A radical rigor which intends to replace traditional Islam in the guise of a return to the original purity of the Qur'anic revelation. "Ideology" and not religion as it is here question of political Islam or in other words, of Islamism, which now takes many faces in different places and circumstances ... be it that of the Brothers Muslims, that of preaching Salafi jihadism or the bloodthirsty. Ideology, "nihilist fundamentally hostile to the traditional values and to all Muslims," promoted and disseminated within and outside the Community of Believers, in the Land of Islam, but also in Europe, including the two "false friends" the West that are Qatar and Saudi. Devouring schism and in the heart of Islam, exacerbating the old antagonism between Sunnis and Shiites. Nothing, however, explains the twenty-first century the seemingly irrational hatred that Wahhabism dedicated to Shi'ism in general and Shiites in particular, apart from the hidden purpose of Wahhabi dogma ... This is indeed the eschatological monopoly, universal and ultimate, after his triumph on the ruins of all the other theological and metaphysical constructions of the Islamic space, or even post-Christian. Finally, if the Westerners interests are not exactly the same as those of the Wahhabi monarchies, such interest to considerable overlap geostrategic, géoénergétique or on that of financial globalization ... Worse, they converge in the spread of an Islam disembodied participant in a soulless monotheism, ie the religion of a globalized world, bearer of any abuse or less totalitarian. 

Re: Wahhabism & New World Order

#3
this is the whole interview translated :)

https://www.voltairenet.org/article186228.html

Voltaire Network: Historically the British instrumented Wahhabism to fight against the Ottoman Empire fell into the hands of revolutionary dönmeh known under the label "Young Turks". Today Turkey you qualify for Islamo-Kemalist supports Wahhabi Caliphate, namely the Islamic state, while the latter has appointed the Saudi Wahhabi monarchy as his second enemy after Shiism. How to explain these contradictions?

Jean-Michel Vernochet: Many questions and few easy. First the goal was not the British in the nineteenth century to seize the Ottoman Empire already more or less moribund prey to the rise of uncontrollable forces. These forces that would return it to nothingness is mainly embodied in the Young Turk Committee of Union and Progress. It is this revolutionary movement, claiming the French Revolution and its roots were at Paris, Geneva, Rome and London, which was to be the main actor in the debacle. The collapse of Ottoman power and the seizure of power in 1913 by Young Turks triumvirate, released on Armenian Genocide and the Kemalist dictatorship. Atheist regime that stands in the shadow of the gallows and would not have been possible without the active support of the English Masonic lodges, French and Italian ... and that of Lenin and the Bolshevik bureaucracy. A little-documented, little known but genuine.

To return to the British Empire in the nineteenth century almost all its policy towards the Sublime Porte (Constantinople) will be determined by an exclusive concern: the protection of Passage to India. Security implies full geographic control of the Persian Gulf. Let us go back and forth to understand the context, both the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and the subsequent emergence of a Wahhabi kingdom of Nejd and Hejaz ... The Crimean War (1853-1856) sees the England allied with France, to aid the Ottomans against Russia. The question at this time is in the form of an alternative: dismember the Empire (but how to agree on sharing it?) That hold it in irreversible coma to stabilize the region, always in the background London the nagging question of the security of maritime and land routes to India.

The fate of the "sick man of Europe" [7] is actually outstanding since the early nineteenth century. An explicit status quo is being established between the Christian powers -England, Germany, Russia, France, Greece, Italy-which somehow froze the ambitions of each other. No one wanted to hasten a fall, moreover inevitable, but that was compromised or challenged the precarious balance of forces in the region. This is what explains the clemency of the Treaty of Adrianople signed in September 1929 after the Russian-Turkish war, the Tsar had considered a decadent Ottoman Empire, exhausted by scavengers debt to finance International, was still preferable to chaos. A form of geopolitical wisdom that has hardly over today ...

This long reminder was necessary to show how in these cases pragmatism prevails over any other considerations, beginning with religious order. Later, by instrumenting during World War Wahhabi dissident tribes of Nejd against the Sublime Porte when the Empire is already virtually dead, London is not to destroy the Ottoman power ally of the German Reich, and nothing other. The religious aspect is here subsidiary, accessory. The world war is raging and the triumvirate Young Turks seized power in Constantinople [8] in 1913, has chosen to link its fate to that of Germany whose economic influence in the Empire is huge ... and he intends to take advantage of the tumult of war to lead to large-scale ethnic cleansing policy against all Christian communities of the Empire. With at Undoubtedly, rear messianic and eschatological thoughts hatred that few even dare raise today. Opens an abyss in which the majority of the Armenian nation will, between 1915 and 1916, be swallowed.

A genocidal policies that build on and complement Kemal Pasha (Ataturk) beyond the defeat of the Young Turks and the Allied victory in 1918, especially in 1924 during the massive transfers of Anatolian Christian population under the Treaty of Lausanne, signed July 24, 1923. Treaty by which definitively ended the Great War was on its eastern front. Note that the atheist fanatic, fellow Committee of Union and Progress, what Kemal Pasha has been, continuing ethnocide [9] begun by his predecessors, a precursor of ethno-religious cleansing currently leads but on a much smaller scale, by salafo-Wahhabi jihadists in northern Iraq against the Assyrian-Chaldean Catholics and Yezidi ...

But back to the pivotal years of the First World War. For the time is at Allies butchering of an Empire who lived and whose dönmeh new masters have made a bad strategic choice, that of the German Reich. While armed rebellions broke out everywhere, Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Palestine, Egypt ... London and Paris are distributed early in 1916 with the secret Sykes-Picot agreement, the remains of the Empire ... this by mocking the promises of independence to the Arabs who fought alongside them. The English will in turn, from 1916, for use Wahhabism its dynamics, its explosive force, as the conquest of fanaticism and ideology, to permanently and securely establish their control over the Arabian Peninsula.

As for the current situation, no doubt we see that there are rivalries between competing powers. Looking at the region's history, especially the last half-century, we are witnessing a constant struggle to try to reach leadership. This was true of Gamal Abdel Nasser, Hafez Assad, Muammar Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein, not to mention the Jewish state, whose role in the destruction of its neighbors and potential enemies, is a database. Now it is Tehran, Ankara, Riyadh who are vying for the same purpose, regardless of their confessional identity. It is therefore in terms of competition I interpret the often bloody struggles that oppose them different salafo-Wahhabi factions. Among them the various movements fighting in Syria, most notably the Islamic State. Similarly, sectarian dimension differences between Saudi Wahhabi Islamist Turkey Daech, is ultimately an accessory in light of at least regional hegemonic ambitions which oppose each other ... and of provided that the Wahhabi ideology is shared by all funds, including the Muslim Brotherhood even if they do not claim it openly.

JPEG - 15.2 kb
Voltaire Network: You said that the Muslim Brotherhood and Wahhabi have much in common, can you tell us more?

Jean-Michel Vernochet: Without being a "Wahhabi secret society", the Muslim Brotherhood are not least one of the extensions of the mother sect headquartered in Riyadh. A meticulous comparison between the doctrines and programs deserve to be led. But insist on a point raised previously: Wahhabism as the Jamiat al-Ikhwan al muslimin [the Muslim Brotherhood] are essentially primarily ideological tools that is to say not in their religious trappings of Puritanism . These are idéocratiques means of conquest and nothing else. On the evident Wahhabism is not the simple and pure expression of a living faith, but his outrageous caricature. Muslims are not mistaken who denounce it as such. These are the Islamic scholars who say it at every turn, not your servant. That is to say, those whose "West" lazy can not hear the voice because it is easier to make the bazaar sociology in the suburbs of European cities with a high density of immigration that ... to look with some humility on the theological dimension of the jihadi phenomenon and its proactive support by the other Puritanism what the Anglo-US Calvinism when it is an instrument of imperialism soulless guts.

Today forgotten, the Association of Muslim Brotherhood created by Hassan al-Banna in 1928 (including his little son is none other than the intellectual Tariq Ramadan) immediately after birth welcomes members of the Ikhwan fleeing Nejd to escape reprisals Abdelaziz ibn Saud. These are the men who will form the core of the new Egyptian Brotherhood. When in 1954 the Brotherhood is dissolved by Nasser in the opposite sense, the Brotherhood cadres naturally leave recharge in Riyadh. Ultimately, the Brotherhood will be born in the 70s the Egyptian Islamic Jihad, predecessor of Daech, aimed at restoration of the caliphate in Egypt. This is what has just accomplished the Islamic state with the blessing of "enemy brothers allies" Ankara, London, Paris, Riyadh, Doha, Washington, Amman and Tel Aviv.

Voltaire Network: The British supported the development of Wahhabism and the United States. Today the Brothers are well represented in the National Security Council in Washington. Can we say the Brotherhood that you report to Wahhabism, that such training would be within the Muslim world ways to destroy Islam from within?

Jean-Michel Vernochet: The continued expansion of Wahhabism in the past century is closely linked to the financial model, economic and societal Anglo-US. The fate of the Arabian Peninsula has been inextricably linked since 1945 and until today the American World ... which forms a kind of hydra with multiple heads, the main ones Manhattan, Chicago (global commodities exchange ), Washington with the Federal Reserve, the City of London, Brussels for NATO, Frankfurt, headquarters of the European Central Bank and Basel that houses a super limited company in the legal sense, the Bank of central banks, in a word, Bank for International Settlements! As such it would be simplistic to see in the Wahhabi ideology as an instrument of influence or regional domination. The Muslim world is a billion and a half people. Take their control is an important issue. In this perspective probably we should see in the Wahhabi ideology attempted unequivocally subversion of Islam. In other words, the Islamic version, namely "adapted to Islam," the new global religion which tends to impose on all nations and all people, whether Christian or Muslim. Social Religion, civilizational mutation religion that precedes and accompanies the progress of a cannibal globalism. A religion designed to replace all others and that can appropriately describe as the "monotheism of the market".

It is clear that Wahhabism coexists perfectly with the anarcho-capitalism. This may seem surprising, but it is undeniable. This barbarous puritanism is intended, or better predestined to replace traditional Islam with its quaint attachment to traditional moral values ​​compassionate essence. To pure while being pure Wahhabism makes lawful the murder of others as long as it does not fully subjected to the same inexorable Shariah law ... as universal democracy and humanitarienne that the United States is working to impose by force of arms to the four corners of the planet. Great America sees its Manifest Destiny incarnate in unlimited right to kill those who show themselves reluctant to enter voluntarily in the Judeo-Protestant Democratic matrix made ​​in America. In short if Wahhabism is an instrument, it is the interior of a scheduled destruction of Islam ... as Marxist messianism and its successor the liberal-libertarian Freudo-Marxism, have continued and continue similar work of death in our postchrétiennes society.

Voltaire Network: There are currently three States which Wahhabism is the official religion of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Sharjah, Member of the UAE. Maybe soon be Cyrenaica [10]. Yet these states engaged them a war without thank you. How to explain it and what are the issues?

Jean-Michel Vernochet: At issue elementary complex answer. Formerly the tribes hurled against each other raids, raids. Today it is no longer bands of looters, but States. We have moved into a higher dimension. But the principle remains the same. Western states share the same idolatry of appearances for a democracy, that does not prevent them from trying to tear each other apart, would be only through an implacable economic war. "A war that dare not speak its name" but who is no less ruthless, that knows neither friend nor ally ... "A war to the death," said Mitterrand fire [11]. The ideological and societal end wars. Look on the side of Russia and of Donbass, a pretty good illustration of this.

Everything becomes clear if we understand that different States and various Wahhabi Muslim Brotherhood variants -among which the ruling Justice and develop Recep Tayyip Erdogan- not just pursue the fulfillment of the word of God earth, nor any transcendent purpose, but rather the goals of purely material power. Their ambitions are those of power. From there, their interests, their strategies and alliances are not exactly the same. In fact, they are most often disagree and almost always rivals. This may seem trivial -in French sense of the term- but if we want to understand how the world works, look at a Hollywood production on a war of mafia gangs, said everything is there! One guts to it that better-best to a territory, a market, a dominant position, a precedence case. If there are differences between these clan wars and those of armed diplomacy, hard and soft power, they are only of scale, not of kind.

Voltaire Network: Al Qaeda is defined as Wahhabi, yet one of its main founders and current leader, Ayman al-Zawahiri is a former Muslim Brother. In fact, if all the leaders of international terrorism declare Wahhabis, most of them are former Muslim Brotherhood. In your opinion, is the current ideology of the Wahhabi jihad or she comes to the secret society of the Muslim Brotherhood?

Jean-Michel Vernochet: I do not think the question is, at this stage, totally relevant: before or after the egg ... since they are the two faces of the same ideology! One and the other have developed and affirmed with the support of the British empire: armed support for the Third Wahhabi kingdom of Nejd and Hejaz, and financial Egypt to the Brotherhood. Thus Wahhabism and Brotherhood are already consubstantial to each other that share the same sponsorship in London and Washington, ultimately in Riyadh. In terms of jihad itself we have seen that the new Egyptian Ikhwan [Brotherhood] has led an armed struggle organization, Islamic Jihad, under the Wahhabi doctrine postulating the existence of a sixth pillar of the Islam, one of the holy war, unknown to classical Islam. Or the obligation to convert by force, by fire and sword if necessary. In this Wahhabism made violence a structural dimension that can only arouse in the West the most categorical rejection. We are here actually in a logic of a frontal collision between cultures and civilizations. This opens a bleak outlook and in our societies, especially the Muslims who were incorporated into it one day soon put on notice, due to the extensive dissemination of a false semblance of Islam, to choose sides. The terrible years experienced by the Algeria during the ninety decade would certainly nothing compared to what European Muslim communities are called to live ... because as we can see it everywhere, it is the Muslims who are prime targets and the first victims of Wahhabism.

Jean-Michel Vernochet
Post Reply

Return to “Information & Resources”